Communications regarding publication of Higher History Review 2024

Date published: 24/04/2025

I would like to request the following under FOISA:

Copies of all internal or external communication regarding publication of the Higher History Review 2024, including media planning

The information requested is contained within the document attached.

We have redacted some sections of these emails under section 30 (b)(ii) of the Act, as disclosure would be likely to substantially inhibit the free and frank exchange of views for the purposes of deliberation from board members.

This exemption is subject to the ‘public interest test’. We recognise that there will be an interest in disclosing information as part of being an open, transparent and accountable public body, and to inform public debate.

However, there is also a public interest in the SQA being able to have free and frank discussion with which to exchange views in order to reach a consensus, which could be negatively impacted. The SQA require a safe space to exchange opinions on the publication of potentially sensitive material.

In line with guidance from the Scottish Government, “while Board members must be ready to offer constructive challenge, they must also share collective responsibility for decisions taken by the Board as a whole. If they fundamentally disagree with the decision taken by the Board, they have the option of recording their concerns in the minutes.

However, ultimately, they must either accept and support the collective decision of the Board – or resign. Board decisions should always comply with statute, Ministerial directions (where this is provided for in statute), Ministerial guidance and the objectives of the sponsor Directorate, as appropriate (noting of course that certain bodies are required to demonstrate independence in order to maintain credibility).”

Board members have the responsibility to exchange views on any subject, and they require a safe space in which to do so as there is a clear expectation on them that, in public, they accept and support the common position. Any disclosure that called into question the opportunity to exchange views before taking collective responsibility would be contrary to this first principle of corporate responsibility.

Disclosing this information may cause a ‘chilling effect’ in future, by inhibiting future internal discussions and exchange of views/opinions. If Board of Management members are aware that the information and comments they provide will be made public there is a significant risk that they will not contribute in the open and transparent way that is required.

Having considered the public interest, we have concluded that the public interest in maintaining the exemption outweighs the public interest in disclosing the requested information.

Please note that the names and identifying information of SQA staff below Head of Service level and non-SQA staff have been removed under section 38 (1)(b) as this is considered personal information.

Communications (9.25 MB)

Timeline (email attachments) (84 KB)